Selecting or buying a robot
We review the intended task, operating limits, configuration and availability of supporting evidence before the purchasing decision.
Deployment assessmentALTAMENTE ROBOTICS · CONFORMITY AND DOCUMENTATION
From the actual task and configuration to usable evidence, clear responsibilities and safe commissioning.
CE marking, product conformity and the safety of the customer installation are connected. Each needs verification within its applicable scope.
We first identify the product, intended purpose, operating environment and legal roles. Labels such as humanoid, service robot or cobot do not determine the complete regulatory scope.
We review the intended task, operating limits, configuration and availability of supporting evidence before the purchasing decision.
Deployment assessmentWe identify the supply route, responsibilities, required evidence and open questions before a particular unit is first placed on the EU market.
Roles and responsibilitiesWe connect product documentation with the actual workplace, task, protective measures, operators and acceptance procedure.
Robot deploymentBefore changing a task, tool, software or AI model, we assess the impact on risks, the original evidence and responsibility.
Modifications after importWe identify AI functions, personal and operational data, remote administration, access rights, transfers and updates.
AI and dataWe help prepare customer use cases, localisation, pilots, integration evidence and the division of work with your team.
For technology vendorsThe output is a relevant procedure and body of evidence for the actual product, configuration and intended use. There is no universal list of certificates for every robot.
A certificate under one directive or one standard does not automatically establish compliance with every law applicable to the actual product configuration. For each document, check the model, version, configuration, covered requirements and connection to the relevant declaration of conformity.
Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC uses the EC declaration of conformity; Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 uses the EU declaration of conformity. Partly completed machinery does not bear CE marking under machinery legislation, although another applicable law may require CE marking.
Primary sources: European Commission — CE · Manufacturer obligations · Directive 2006/42/EC · Regulation 2023/1230
Extending a function can change safety conditions and legal responsibility for the modified product. The original evidence must be assessed against the actual configuration.
RoHS has its own change rule: under Article 11, an importer or distributor can assume manufacturer obligations when supplying under its own name or trademark or modifying equipment in a way that may affect conformity. Changes therefore also require assessment against the other legislation applicable to the configuration.
Primary sources: RoHS — Article 11
From 20 January 2027, the Machinery Regulation explicitly defines substantial modification by physical or digital means. If its conditions are met, the person performing the modification assumes manufacturer obligations and ensures the applicable conformity assessment. Under that regulation, an importer or distributor can also become the manufacturer when supplying under its own name or trademark or making a modification that may affect conformity.
Skill training and HRI: we first define permitted behaviour, task boundaries, speeds and forces, contact conditions, oversight and failure responses. We validate the new version against agreed criteria and record its impact on risks and evidence. For AI subject to the relevant regime, we distinguish changes predetermined and documented in the original assessment from substantial modifications; machinery AI also requires consideration of its sectoral framework.
Primary sources: Regulation 2023/1230, Articles 3, 17 and 18 · Blue Guide 2022 — product changes · AI Act, Article 43 — AI modifications · AI Act, Article 25 — value-chain roles
The label “partner” or “integrator” does not replace a legal role. Before a pilot or delivery, we document system boundaries, evidence and responsibilities.
| Role | What must be clarified |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Responsible for product conformity, the relevant assessment, technical documentation, declaration, marking and instructions. Manufacturer obligations |
| EU importer | Before a product from a third country is placed on the EU market, checks the relevant assessment, technical documentation, the applicable declaration, CE marking where required and accompanying information. Under the Machinery Regulation from 20 January 2027, the role also includes retaining the EU declaration and ensuring access to technical evidence under Article 13; partly completed machinery follows Article 14 and a declaration of incorporation. The customs declarant and product-law importer may be different entities. Regulation — Articles 13–14 · Importers and distributors |
| Distributor | Acts with due care, checks required markings and accompanying information, and handles the product without compromising conformity. Importers and distributors |
| Integrator / manufacturer of the completed assembly | Assess separately whether the work creates an assembly of machinery, a new product or a substantially modified product, and who is responsible for the completed system. Directive — definition of machinery · Regulation — changes and roles |
| Operator / employer | Addresses safe workplace use, instructions, operators, maintenance and applicable inspections. Product CE marking does not replace these operational duties. Use of work equipment |
| ALTAMENTE | Provides the agreed integration and documentation coordination, evidence records and preparation for specialist verification. Any additional legal role is determined by the actual supply arrangement and a separate agreement. |
A robot also needs assessment in the context of the task, workplace, people and other equipment. Robot documentation may not cover the completed application.
Where work-equipment safety depends on installation conditions, Directive 2009/104/EC requires an initial inspection after installation and before first use, and inspection after assembly at a new location, under relevant national rules. We define the conditions of a controlled pilot and subsequent routine operation separately.
Primary sources: Directive 2009/104/EC, Article 5 · Machinery Directive · Machinery Regulation
Verified on 5 October 2026. Each row depends on the actual product and intended use; this is not a set of mandatory certifications for every robot.
For the actual supply: exact model and unit, hardware, software, AI and tooling configuration, intended use, first placement on the EU market and, where relevant, commissioning date. For EPR, also establish first supply and the responsible party in each destination Member State. Manufacturing, shipping dates or a generic certificate do not replace this record.
| Area | When to check it and relevant dates | Primary evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC | Machinery first placed on the EU market or put into service up to 19 January 2027 within the directive’s scope. Check transitional rules for units already lawfully placed on the market; manufacturing or import dates alone do not determine the regime. | EC — Machinery · Directive |
| Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 | Machinery and related products within its scope from 20 January 2027. Assess manufacturer, importer and distributor duties and the impact of changes. Previously lawfully placed products may benefit from applicable transitional rules. | EC — application · Regulation, Articles 52 and 54 |
| RED 2014/53/EU | A robot or accessory with radio equipment, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Check the supplied configuration and the scope of radio, EMC and safety evidence. RED applies from 13 June 2016; selected cybersecurity requirements from August 2025, with the CRA transition from 11 December 2027. | EC — RED and cybersecurity requirements |
| RoHS 2011/65/EU | Where electrical or electronic equipment falls within scope. Check material evidence, exclusions and exemption validity, documentation, EU declaration and CE marking. National transposition deadline: 2 January 2013; the previous directive was replaced from 3 January 2013. Extended scope for previously uncovered EEE from 22 July 2019. | RoHS — Articles 2, 4, 7, 13–15 and 25–26 |
| Batteries — Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 | Batteries, including those incorporated in a robot. Generally from 18 February 2024, with staged dates; waste/EPR rules from 18 August 2025. Check category and the applicable procedure, evidence, declaration/CE and registration/EPR in the destination country. Other requirements have separate dates. | Regulation — Articles 1, 17–20, 55–56 and 96 |
| CRA (EU) 2024/2847 | Products with digital elements within its scope. Manufacturers report actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe security incidents from 11 September 2026; main requirements from 11 December 2027. | EC — reporting · EC — CRA |
| WEEE 2012/19/EU | EEE within scope. National transposition deadline: 14 February 2014; open scope from 15 August 2018, subject to exclusions. Registration, reporting, separate collection and e-waste financing by destination country and role. Environmental/EPR duties, rather than an additional CE certificate. | WEEE — Articles 2, 12–16 and 24–25 |
| AI Act (EU) 2024/1689, amended by 2026/1744 | According to the actual AI function, intended use and classification, rather than automatically because a robot includes AI. Generally from 2 August 2026, with exceptions. High-risk under Article 6(2) / Annex III: Chapter III, Sections 1–3 from 2 December 2027. High-risk under Article 6(1) / Annex I: relevant requirements from 2 August 2028. Machinery AI requires the sectoral treatment explained below. | Current Article 113 · EC — enacted amendment |
| Workplace safety | Separately from product conformity, for the actual installation, task, people and connected equipment. Risk assessment, safeguards, acceptance, operators and relevant work-equipment inspections under national rules. | Directive 2009/104/EC — Article 5 |
| EMC 2014/30/EU | From 20 April 2016. Electromagnetic emissions and immunity of equipment within its scope; fixed installations have specific rules. | EC — EMC |
| LVD 2014/35/EU | From 20 April 2016. Electrical equipment within the relevant voltage range. Machinery legislation addresses machinery electrical hazards; a separate power supply or charger may have its own regime. | EC — LVD · Directive, Annex I, section 1.5.1 |
| GDPR (EU) 2016/679 | From 25 May 2018. Where personal data are processed: purpose, lawful basis, scope, retention, access and transfers. | EC — GDPR |
The European Commission allows manufacturers of machinery placed on the market before 20 January 2027 to also state conformity with Regulation 2023/1230 where applicable. This does not remove the requirement to comply with Directive 2006/42/EC until then. Mentioning the future regulation alone therefore does not establish whether particular evidence is correct.
Primary sources: EC — Machinery
Additional regimes may apply by purpose, such as medical devices or explosive atmospheres. Overlaps and exclusions follow the actual product and supply arrangement.
Remote administration and software changes can affect both data and safe robot behaviour. Define product, integration and operational responsibilities before deployment.
CRA: from 11 September 2026, manufacturers of products within scope must report certain actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents affecting product security. Main requirements apply from 11 December 2027. Check scope and transitional rules for the product and responsible entity; these duties cannot be assigned to every robot user indiscriminately.
Primary sources: EC — CRA reporting · CRA — Articles 14, 69 and 71 · EC — RED · Machinery Regulation
Conversation, task control and a safety function do not automatically have the same AI regime. We define classification alongside product documentation and the customer system boundary.
Separate AI functions can fall under another regime, including specific Annex III categories. We also assess applicable transparency rules and prohibited practices. Performance optimisation or user assistance is not necessarily a safety component; whether its failure endangers health and safety also matters.
Primary sources: EC — AI Omnibus · AI Act, Article 2 · AI Act, Annex I · AI Act, Article 6 · EC — AI Act · EC — personal data protection
We select standards according to function and system boundaries. Assessment checks the current edition, relevant European EN version, Official Journal citation and restrictions, and the requirements actually covered.
| Application | Examples of technical evidence and their limits | Primary source |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial robot and application | ISO 10218-1 / -2: robot safety and integration of an industrial application or cell. Platform mobility or use in areas accessible to the public requires a separate scope review. | ISO 10218-1 · ISO 10218-2 |
| Driverless industrial truck | ISO 3691-4: safety of relevant driverless industrial trucks and their systems, including AGVs or AMRs meeting its definition. The operating zone also matters; it does not cover every mobile robot. | ISO 3691-4 |
| Personal care robot | ISO 13482: personal care robots within its scope, including certain physical contact applications. It does not universally cover service humanoids and excludes robots used as medical devices. | ISO 13482 |
| Risk and control-system safety | ISO 12100: risk assessment and reduction throughout the machine lifecycle. ISO 13849 / IEC 62061: safety-related control parts and functional safety according to the chosen solution. The application assessment determines the actual functions and required safety level. | ISO 12100 · ISO 13849-1 · IEC 62061 |
A new ISO or IEC edition is not automatically a harmonised European standard cited under the applicable legislation. Harmonised standards are voluntary and provide a presumption of conformity only for the requirements they cover, under their citation conditions. Other technical solutions need appropriate evidence. A standard, test report or voluntary certificate does not by itself replace compliance with legal requirements and the responsible manufacturer’s declaration.
Primary sources: EC — harmonised standards · EC — machinery standards · EC — assessment and documentation
The scope follows the actual model, version and planned task. The result should be usable evidence for the manufacturer, customer and relevant specialists.
Handover connects vendor evidence with the actual customer application. The customer receives a traceable view of conformity, missing evidence, responsibilities and verification needed before a change or release of a new version.
Service scope: ALTAMENTE provides the agreed preparation, integration and coordination. Responsibility for conformity and the relevant declaration belongs to the entity determined by law; the appropriate parties perform specialist testing and assessments under the selected procedure. Their involvement is defined before work begins.
ALTAMENTE
Send the model, configuration, intended task, operating location and planned supply or modification. We will identify the initial evidence needed and propose a scope of cooperation.
AI-generated